Joachim
+ The working group was right on topic and made good progress; criteria for success are likely to be met
+ Learned much from the general discussion
+ A reconfiguration would not have allowed to be as successful
+ Great atmosphere; nice group, late night swim was good, good alcoholic baseline of participants
- Internet was not working
- a full day of presentations was a bit too much



Matthias
+ Working groups; very homogeneous/affinity of group members
- there could have been more prep work before the workshop start
+ learned a lot
+/- Internet access
+ atmosphere was good; extracurricular experience was good



Benoît
+ atmosphere was very good; group activity much appreciated
+ learned a lot from all and hope we will be able to continue the impetus that we gained during this week
? can we have a closing AOM/CAMPaM plenary to share the results obtained?



Cécile
+ schedule of the work day was good (lunch at Surfside, swimming opportunities)
+ great atmosphere, friendly
+ organization; concrete, goal oriented
- would have been appreciated to have more brainstorm like session
+ good to establish personal contact to make it easier to collaborate afterwards
+ good to have presentations in the beginning
- a full day of presentations was too long
- no *good* internet access
- no white board in the room


Antonio
+/- The working group was partially on topic of activity/satisfied a natural curiosity
+ potential collaboration discovered
+ atmosphere, exchange (formal and informal)
- presentations could have been distributed over the duration/kept internal to working groups
- could have been more brainstorming at the expense of a more distilled version of a paper
+ good (necessary) to have leisure activity
-- internet


Paul
+ learned a lot, in particular the depth of modeling & simulation
+ concepts can become part of everyday problem solving
+ the way of working (lectures, smaller groups) was very effective because all focused on the same goals
- domain divergence, not many opportunity to interject and exploit the group as a sounding board
- full day of presentations was too long
- during the working group it was difficult to get to the broader context of the topic
+ nop
+/- internet quality was quite disturbing


Hans-san
+ most relaxed workshop I have been at (thanks to small size?)


Thomas
+ interdisciplinary character
+ was good to have talks up front
- talks could have been slightly shorter
- schedule was better than in early years but still too optimistic at times
  this often led to team members waiting for each other 
- focus on deliverables was not as excellent as in 2009
  but tangential discussions will hopefully pay off for future work
- internet access was problem
- midnight swim should be "fun only" not part of a competition
  makes it hard to get the sleep one needs for the intense workdays


Eugene
+/- internet access
- less immediate result than previous year
+ talks and forensics were informative
+ overall good


Pieter
+ atmosphere was great
+ really enjoyed the keynotes
+/- internet
- working group debrief could be better
+/- too much variance on schedule 
- rum funds have not been properly planned